Your product backlog is packed with good ideas. Your sales team is adamant that Feature A will close bigger deals. The marketing team is pushing for Feature B to drive a new campaign. And your own user research suggests that Feature C will be a game-changer for customer retention. With limited development time and resources, you’re faced with the timeless product manager dilemma: how do you decide which initiative will deliver the most bang for your buck?
Prioritization often feels like a messy art, guided by gut feelings, stakeholder influence, or simply the “loudest voice in the room.” But what if there was a structured, data-informed way to bring objectivity to these crucial decisions? What if you could calculate a single, comparable score to evaluate every idea on a level playing field?
This is the power of the RICE Scoring model. It’s a simple yet robust prioritization framework designed to help you think critically about what makes an idea valuable and make confident, defensible roadmap decisions. This guide will make you a master of RICE, taking you from the basic formula to the pro-level nuances of applying it effectively with your team.
The Origins of RICE: A Message from Intercom
The RICE framework is not an abstract academic theory; it was forged in the real world of a fast-growing tech company. It was developed and popularized by the team at Intercom, the well-known customer messaging platform.
As Intercom grew, their teams struggled with competing ideas and inconsistent methods for deciding what to build next. To solve this, their product team, including Sean McBride who first wrote about it publicly, created the RICE framework as a way to standardize their prioritization process. They needed a model that would force them to consider not just the potential impact of an idea, but also how many customers it would affect and how confident they were in their own estimations all balanced against the cost to build it. This origin story is key to its practical, no-nonsense approach.
The 4 Factors of RICE: A Detailed Breakdown
To use RICE effectively, you must understand how to quantify each of its four factors.
R – Reach: How many people will this impact?
Reach is designed to force you to think about the audience size for your initiative. An idea that affects all of your users is inherently more valuable than one that affects only a small segment.
- How to Quantify It: Estimate the number of users who will encounter this feature over a specific time period (e.g., a month or a quarter). Use real data from your product analytics wherever possible.
- Example for a web app: “How many unique users log in and reach this page per month?”
- Example for a trial experience: “How many new trial users will see this feature per quarter?”
- Your Value for R: The final number you estimated (e.g., 5,000 users/month).
I – Impact: How much will this impact each person?
Impact measures the degree to which your initiative will affect the user or your goal. It answers the question, “When a user encounters this, how much will it move the needle on a key metric like conversion, adoption, or satisfaction?”
- How to Quantify It: Since impact can be subjective, Intercom recommends a simple, tiered scale to keep scoring consistent:
- 3 = Massive impact
- 2 = High impact
- 1 = Medium impact
- 0.5 = Low impact
- 0.25 = Minimal impact
- Your Value for I: A number from the scale (e.g., 2 for high impact).
C – Confidence: How confident are you in your estimates?
This is the crucial reality check. It’s a factor designed to temper enthusiasm for exciting but poorly-defined ideas. If you have solid data to back up your Reach and Impact scores, your confidence will be high. If you’re mostly guessing, your confidence should be low.
- How to Quantify It: Express your confidence as a percentage.
- 100% = High confidence (You have quantitative data from user testing or market research).
- 80% = Medium confidence (You have qualitative data and support, but it’s not fully quantified).
- 50% = Low confidence (This is a “gut feeling” with little to no data).
- Your Value for C: A percentage (e.g., 80% or 0.8).
E – Effort: How much time will this require from the team?
Effort is the “cost” part of the equation. It’s an estimate of the total time required from all team members (product, design, and engineering) to complete the project.
- How to Quantify It: Estimate the total work in “person-months” (the work one person can do in a month). This is often easier for teams to estimate than vague t-shirt sizes.
- Example: A small project that will take 1 designer and 2 engineers about a week would be roughly 0.75 person-months. A large project requiring 4 engineers for a full month would be 4 person-months.
- Your Value for E: The total number of person-months (e.g., 2).
How to Use the RICE Framework: A Step-by-Step Guide
- List Your Competing Ideas: Gather all the features, projects, or initiatives you want to prioritize in a spreadsheet or prioritization tool.
- Estimate the R.I.C.E. Factors for Each Idea: Go through each item on your list and, as a team, estimate the four values. This is a collaborative process get input from engineering for Effort, and use data and user research to inform Reach, Impact, and Confidence.
- Calculate the Final RICE Score: For each idea, plug your four estimated values into the formula
(R x I x C) / E. - Rank Your Ideas and Discuss the Results: Sort your list by the final RICE score, from highest to lowest. This new ranked list is your data-informed starting point for a roadmap discussion.
RICE Scoring in Action: A Worked Example
Imagine a product team for a project management tool is trying to prioritize three potential features for the next quarter.
- Feature A: New Dashboard Widgets: Allowing users to customize their main dashboard.
- Feature B: Slack Integration: Sending project updates directly to Slack channels.
- Feature C: Full Performance Overhaul: Refactoring old code to make the app faster.
Here’s how they might score them:
| Feature | Reach (users/month) | Impact (0.25-3) | Confidence (50-100%) | Effort (person-months) | RICE Score (RIC)/E | Rank |
| A: Dashboard Widgets | 5,000 | 2 (High) | 80% (0.8) | 3 | 2,667 | 2 |
| B: Slack Integration | 2,000 | 3 (Massive) | 100% (1.0) | 2 | 3,000 | 1 |
| C: Performance Overhaul | 10,000 | 1 (Medium) | 50% (0.5) | 4 | 1,250 | 3 |
Discussion: Even though the Performance Overhaul had the highest Reach, its medium impact and low confidence gave it the lowest score. The Slack Integration, despite having a smaller Reach, scored highest because of its massive impact and high confidence. This RICE score gives the team a strong, objective starting point to decide to prioritize the Slack Integration.
RICE vs. Other Prioritization Frameworks
RICE vs. ICE
The ICE model is a simpler predecessor to RICE. It scores ideas on Impact, Confidence, and Ease (the inverse of Effort). The RICE framework improved upon ICE by adding the Reach factor, forcing teams to consider the audience size instead of just their own excitement about a feature’s potential impact.
RICE vs. MoSCoW
These two frameworks serve different purposes.
- RICE is quantitative. It’s best for ranking a long list of disparate ideas to find the highest-value items.
- MoSCoW is qualitative. It’s best for facilitating a stakeholder discussion to define the scope of a specific release by categorizing features as Must-have, Should-have, etc.
Common Mistakes to Avoid When Using RICE Scoring
- Letting Bias Skew the Scores: Be honest. Don’t inflate Impact or Confidence scores for a pet feature. Challenge each other’s assumptions with data.
- Arguing Over Exact Numbers: The final RICE score is not an absolute scientific truth. It’s a tool for relative prioritization. Don’t waste hours debating if Effort is 2 person-months or 2.5. Agree on a reasonable estimate and move on.
- Following the Score Blindly: The RICE score is an input to your decision, not the decision itself. There might be strategic reasons (like a dependency or a direct competitor move) to prioritize a lower-scoring item. Use the score to facilitate a smarter conversation.
- Forgetting to Re-evaluate: The R, I, C, and E values for a feature can change over time as you learn more. Re-score your backlog periodically to ensure your priorities are still relevant.
Conclusion
The RICE scoring model is more than just a formula; it’s a discipline. It forces you and your team to step back from the excitement of a new idea and think critically about its true potential in a structured way. It pushes you to ask the hard questions: Who is this for? How much will it really help them? How sure are we? And what will it truly cost us?
Its greatest strength is not in delivering a perfect, scientifically accurate number. Its true value lies in its ability to facilitate a more objective, transparent, and data-informed conversation about priorities. By using RICE, you replace arguments based on opinion with discussions based on a shared framework, empowering you to build your roadmap with clarity, focus, and confidence.
FAQ’s
There is no universal “good” RICE score. The score is unitless and its only purpose is for relative ranking. A feature with a score of 3,000 is a higher priority than one with a score of 1,500. The goal is not to hit a certain number, but to use the scores to create a prioritized list.
“Effort” should be a collaborative estimate from the entire team involved (engineering, design, QA). The best practice is to estimate it in “person-months”—the total amount of work one person can do in a month. This is often more concrete and less abstract than story points or t-shirt sizes.
While it was designed by and for product managers, its principles can be used by anyone needing to prioritize a list of competing initiatives. Marketing teams can use it to prioritize campaigns, operations teams can use it to prioritize improvement projects, and so on.
You should re-evaluate and re-score your backlog initiatives periodically, especially at the beginning of a new planning cycle (e.g., quarterly). Your Confidence scores may increase as you do more research, or Effort estimates may change. Keeping the scores fresh ensures your priorities remain aligned with your current knowledge.
You calculate the RICE score using its simple formula: RICE Score = (Reach x Impact x Confidence) / Effort. First, estimate the Reach (how many people will be affected in a period), Impact (how much it will affect each person, on a scale), and your Confidence in those estimates (as a percentage). Multiply these three numbers together. Then, estimate the Effort required from the team (in “person-months”). Finally, divide the first number by the Effort to get your final RICE score, which you can use to compare against other initiatives.
To ensure consistency and objectivity when using the RICE model, follow these guidelines:
Reach: Use real data from your analytics tools for a specific time period (e.g., users per month), not just a vague guess.
Impact: Define a consistent, pre-set scale for your team to use (e.g., 3 = massive, 2 = high, 1 = medium, 0.5 = low).
Confidence: Use a percentage scale to be honest about your estimates. High confidence (100%) should be backed by data, medium (80%) by qualitative support, and low (50%) for ideas with little evidence.
Effort: Estimate this as a team, including developers and designers, using a standard unit like “person-months” to get a realistic picture of the total cost.
Scoring models are used to systematically evaluate and rank competing initiatives (like features or projects). They help teams make objective, consistent, and transparent decisions about what to prioritize when resources are limited.
The main benefit is that RICE replaces subjective opinions with an objective scoring system. It forces teams to consistently evaluate a feature’s potential benefits (Reach, Impact) against its costs (Effort) and risks (Confidence), leading to more data-informed decisions.
Learn better with active recall quiz
How well do you know What Is RICE Scoring? Let’s find out with this quick quiz! (just 10 questions)
