Research traced every friction point to one step, picking ETFs, so three layered fixes build conviction before the money is committed
New investors setting up ETF savings plans on Scalable Capital face wide choice and thin guidance. Earlier research found 60 percent reported low or medium confidence when selecting ETFs, all friction traced back to that selection step, and 40 percent modified or paused their plans during market volatility. Nothing here is hard to execute. What people lack is clarity on how many ETFs are enough and why a given combination fits their situation.
Three interventions stack on top of each other. Portfolio presets offer curated one, two and three ETF bundles so nobody starts from a blank slate. An ETF comparison simplifier shows three metrics by default, region, cost and risk level, and hides advanced detail until it is asked for. Before allocation is confirmed, a 'Why This Mix Works' panel lays out diversification count, geographic exposure, risk alignment and historical recovery context. The primary metric is 30-day savings plan retention, targeting a 15 percent improvement.
Worth stealing
Read this if
PMs whose users finish a flow but never believe in the choice they made
The transferable bitEarly modification within 14 days is used as a proxy for post-purchase regret, which is a smart way to measure whether a decision stuck rather than whether it happened. The guardrails on concentration risk and confusion tickets then keep a simplified interface from quietly pushing people into under-diversified portfolios.
Reading on a phone? The embedded viewer is cramped — open the PDF in a new tab instead.