Personal voice skill
The assignment
Create your personal voice skill — one that communicates in your style. Pull from LinkedIn posts and writing samples.
✳What Niraj shipped
MyVoiceSkill, an AI skill published on GitHub as niraj-linkedin-voice, with a SKILL.md, README, and a references folder. It's built around a specific structural pattern the author identified in his own posts - setting up an assumption, then breaking it - checked against a five-point validation list before finalizing a draft.
✳Our read on this build
Niraj shipped a public GitHub repo. This read comes from the artifact and Niraj's own account of it — no scores, just what the build does and does not show.
What it demonstrates
- The voice has a source: LinkedIn posts and the builder's own writing — which is what stops the output sounding like everyone else's feed.
- It is packaged like an asset — a SKILL.md, a README and a public repo — so it outlives the session it was made in.
What is not shown
- There is no side-by-side of generated text against something the builder actually wrote, so voice accuracy has to be taken on trust.
Take this awayThe reusable lesson: a voice is a file, not a prompt. Named, described, fed on your real posts, it means every future draft starts closer to you.
✳Why this quest matters
A reusable Skill beats a clever one-off prompt every time. Packaging your voice as a named, described, instructed artifact is the difference between a trick you re-type and an asset you — and your team — can run tomorrow.
✳What separated the strongest builds
Seeded on writing that is actually yours
Real LinkedIn posts and writing samples as source material. A voice built from adjectives — 'punchy, warm, contrarian' — sounds like everyone else's.
Packaged as an asset, not a prompt
A name, a description, instructions, a file someone else could run tomorrow. That is the difference between a skill and a paragraph you re-type.
A voice match a reader can judge
The skill's output shown next to something the builder genuinely wrote, so the resemblance is visible rather than asserted.
No numeric scores are published here. These pages are written reads of what each builder shipped — the build is the point, not a mark out of a hundred.