Personal voice skill
The assignment
Create your personal voice skill — one that communicates in your style. Pull from LinkedIn posts and writing samples.
✳What Sakshi shipped
Voice Skill, an AI skill packaged as a public GitHub repo with SKILL.md alongside dedicated onboarding, voice-profile, guardrails, LinkedIn-format, post-types, anti-pattern, and inspiration reference files. It turns a rough thought into a LinkedIn post through a guided interview and multi-step confirmation process, with a design principle of never inventing content that wasn't provided.
✳Our read on this build
Sakshi shipped a public GitHub repo. This read comes from the artifact and Sakshi's own account of it — no scores, just what the build does and does not show.
What it demonstrates
- The voice has a source: LinkedIn posts — which is what stops the output sounding like everyone else's feed.
- It is packaged like an asset — a SKILL.md and a public repo — so it outlives the session it was made in.
What is not shown
- There is no side-by-side of generated text against something the builder actually wrote, so voice accuracy has to be taken on trust.
Take this awayNote what makes this reusable — it is written down. Instructions, examples and a description mean the next person, or the next you, gets the voice without a briefing call.
✳Why this quest matters
A reusable Skill beats a clever one-off prompt every time. Packaging your voice as a named, described, instructed artifact is the difference between a trick you re-type and an asset you — and your team — can run tomorrow.
✳What separated the strongest builds
Seeded on writing that is actually yours
Real LinkedIn posts and writing samples as source material. A voice built from adjectives — 'punchy, warm, contrarian' — sounds like everyone else's.
Packaged as an asset, not a prompt
A name, a description, instructions, a file someone else could run tomorrow. That is the difference between a skill and a paragraph you re-type.
A voice match a reader can judge
The skill's output shown next to something the builder genuinely wrote, so the resemblance is visible rather than asserted.
No numeric scores are published here. These pages are written reads of what each builder shipped — the build is the point, not a mark out of a hundred.